What option does the City have regarding the termination of the Agreement?

The option that allows the City to terminate the Agreement for convenience and without cause is correct because it provides the City with the flexibility to end the Agreement when it deems necessary, without having to justify the decision with specific reasons such as the contractor's performance. This provision is particularly important for an organization that may need to adapt to changing circumstances or priorities, ensuring that it has the ability to disengage from contracts that no longer align with its goals or strategies.

This contrasts with the other choices. For instance, limiting termination strictly to the contractor's non-performance does not offer the city any leeway to terminate based on its changing needs or other considerations. Changing the terms without termination would not fully address situations where the City may want to simply discontinue the Agreement entirely. Lastly, extending the Agreement indefinitely lacks practical utility as it could create uncertainties regarding the duration and obligations of the contract, which could hinder planning and resource allocation. Therefore, having the option to terminate for convenience allows for a more agile and responsive management of contracts.