What happens if the City rejects Sprint deliverables?

When the City rejects Sprint deliverables, it indicates that the submitted work does not meet the specified criteria or quality standards established in the contractor agreement. In such cases, the City is entitled to another Review Period. This means they have the right to reevaluate the revised deliverables after the contractor has had an opportunity to address the feedback provided during the initial review.

This process allows for iterative improvement and fosters collaboration between the contractor and the City to ensure that the final product aligns with the project goals and quality expectations. By establishing a Review Period after rejection, the agreement encourages constructive adjustments rather than immediate punitive actions, which is conducive to a successful project outcome.