What action should a Contractor take if there is a conflict between the RFP and their proposal?

The correct choice emphasizes the precedence of the Agreement and task orders over the Request for Proposal (RFP) and the Contractor's proposal in case of a conflict. This aligns with standard practices in contract law and procurement processes, where explicit agreements and task orders typically take priority when situations arise that create discrepancies or ambiguities between documents.

This principle ensures clarity and maintains the integrity of the contractual relationship, allowing for the enforcement of mutually agreed-upon terms that have been formally recognized in the Agreement and task orders. When the Agreement and task orders are invoked, they provide a definitive framework for resolving issues and guide the obligations and rights of the parties involved, ensuring compliance with the overarching contract.

In relation to the other options: simply ignoring the RFP would lead to non-compliance and can create legal repercussions. Seeking clarification can be useful, but it may not resolve the conflict if the other documents are determined to be controlling. Altering the proposal to fit the RFP without regard for the higher-level agreements can result in inconsistencies and potential legal issues down the line. Thus, adhering to the established hierarchy of documents is essential to maintaining the validity of the contractual agreement.