Can a contractor assign their duties or obligations under the Agreement?

The reasoning behind selecting that a contractor can assign their duties or obligations under the Agreement only with written approval from the City lies in the need for accountability and oversight in contractual relationships, particularly in the context of government agreements.

Requiring written approval ensures that all parties are aware of and agree to any changes in responsibilities. This is important as it maintains a record of consent, which can be referenced in case of disputes. Written consent also helps protect the interests of the City by ensuring that the contractor remains responsible for maintaining the quality and standards defined in the original Agreement, regardless of who is fulfilling those obligations.

While options suggesting verbal consent or majority approval may seem more flexible, they lack the necessary formality and documentation that written consent entails. These informal agreements can lead to misunderstandings or miscommunications. Stating that assignment is not permitted under any circumstance neglects the potential for legitimate reassignment through appropriate channels, where necessary. Thus, the insistence on written approval strikes a balance between allowing some flexibility for contractors and maintaining the integrity and oversight required in agreements involving public resources.